Good design, decent battery life, and lean software aside, there's very little that's actually appealing. The Nokia 2.4 feels like it should have been positioned a few steps below its current asking price. Comparison between: - Nokia 2.3 - Nokia 2.4 - Nokia 3.4 - Nokia 3.1 C Brand and model Design SIM card Networks Mobile network technologies and bandwidth. Image quality is strictly average even when shooting in daylight.The cameras didn't fare well in low light, producing shots with weak details and chroma noise in dark regions. The device comes with 2GB/3GB RAM and 32GB/64GB storage configuration. These affordable phones are designed to last, with a combination of large batteries and. I easily managed to use it for a day and half on one charge, which is pretty good. As for the Nokia 2.4, it gets its power from the MediaTek Helio P22 chipset which is also an entry-level chipset. The Nokia 2.4 costs 139 or 99 British pounds and the Nokia 3.4 is 179 or 129 British pounds. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. While the display produces decent colours when watching videos or any type of content, the viewing angles are very weak. The Nokia 2.4 does offer good battery life.
However, the front glass is very reflective, and the screen doesn't get very bright. HMD Global has used the slightly dated MediaTek Helio P22 octa-core SoC for the Nokia 2.4, due to which, the OS feels a bit laggy pretty much all the time.
HMD Global seldom disappoints when it comes to the design of its phones, and despite the Nokia 2.4 being an entry-level model, it looks quite premium. The Nokia 2.4 has a dedicated Google Assistant button too. The Nokia 2.4 has a large 6.5-inch HD+ display with decent colour saturation.
0 kommentar(er)
